is locked in the Searle’s Chinese Room, and he/she (it?) does the translation work perfectly. Simulation of an explosion is never an explosion.A computer may look intelligent, understanding, touching, and even emotional, but it achieved them by following digital symbol processing rules, which are the simulations of intelligence, understanding, touching, and emotions.He assume “programs are entirely syntactical”.He is proving “computer programs are not mind, i.e., they are entirely syntactical”.Therefore, computer programs are not minds Syntax is not same as, or sufficient for, semantics.But the person inside the room knows not a single word of Chinese!.From the stand point of a person outside of the room, the person in the room understands Chinese well since he answered the questions in Chinese perfectly.He answers questions in Chinese given to him from the outside according to the instructions in the rule book.A person knowing nothing about Chinese is locked in a room with a rule book about Chinese symbols.Intelligence – defined in terms of “results” or in terms of “process”?.Some insist that intelligence or not should be determined by its internal mechanism …Īmbiguities in Objectives of Turing Test.If a human-like robot showed such intelligence, then we would not distinguish it from a real person in terms of intelligence of thinking. It passes the “intelligence of thinking”.Its “art intelligence” and “sport intelligence” are not tested.Is a Machine Passed Turing Test Intelligent?
Higher level consciousnesses pre-require higher level intelligence, though it is controversial whether lower level consciousnesses must be associated with certain level of intelligence.Different between intelligence and consciousness?.
0 kommentar(er)
